They criticize Marxism and Trotskyism, but then have no problem doing the classic Trot thing of broadly painting their opponent's as "campist" (down to the word). Is this what they mean by "diversity of tactics"?

Like, I won't tell you that there aren't, let's call them, "national contrarians," but they're using the term the same way Trots do in obscuring why some people think these states deserve circumstantial or even broad support. "It's all contrarianism!" "It's all an inverted false consciousness!" The line of questioning ends there.