On the one hand, that’s weird, on the other it’s fucking ridley scott. His final cuts are infamous, for one reason or another. He’ll come out with a director’s version, with the subtext being it’s the producer’s fault.
I just don’t understand how a director of his reputation doesn’t just get the green light from hollywood to do what he wants, but then I see the slop that’s in mainstream theaters and realize they’re not the brightest bunch
all of the editing on this film is suspect. I've heard of a gay kiss that was removed. Now this
On the one hand, that’s weird, on the other it’s fucking ridley scott. His final cuts are infamous, for one reason or another. He’ll come out with a director’s version, with the subtext being it’s the producer’s fault.
I just don’t understand how a director of his reputation doesn’t just get the green light from hollywood to do what he wants, but then I see the slop that’s in mainstream theaters and realize they’re not the brightest bunch
Hell even Spielberg does whatever the fuck he wants and gloats about it to their face.
I found a YouTube link in your comment. Here are links to the same video on alternative frontends that protect your privacy:
It could be capitalism. People watch a movie because ridley Scott. Same people buy the directors cut because ridley Scott