The NYPD claims to already have DNA evidence and if that's the case I have to assume they have no idea who it belongs to or can't 100% link it to the assassinatoon, otherwise they would have put a name out already.
lmao i mean i guess if they had the name they gave the nurse and found the cup, they could??? but from what i read he used cash at starbucks and could have just said any name
Not to mention cops hate it when expert witnesses testify on DNA evidence because turns out real life is not CSI: Miami and DNA evidence is not really conclusive at all.
So them having DNA, even if true, means diddly squat.
The NYPD claims to already have DNA evidence and if that's the case I have to assume they have no idea who it belongs to or can't 100% link it to the assassinatoon, otherwise they would have put a name out already.
They have no idea.
Lmao where would they have gotten the shooter's DNA from? What a ridiculous claim to make
they say a water bottle and candy wrapper
I'm guessing it's smoke but who knows
The guy went in an alley and they found those things in the alley, right?
Essentially they are saying they found litter in a New York alleyway.
Based on the DNA found on the water bottle and candy wrapper, the shooter was a giant rat, apparently
theres no way he was eating candy and drinking water in the five minutes he was standing there and just dumped the trash
I think they claimed to have recovered it from the Starbucks but I really don't remember clearly
lmao i mean i guess if they had the name they gave the nurse and found the cup, they could??? but from what i read he used cash at starbucks and could have just said any name
Not to mention cops hate it when expert witnesses testify on DNA evidence because turns out real life is not CSI: Miami and DNA evidence is not really conclusive at all.
So them having DNA, even if true, means diddly squat.