Prince Pyotr Alexeyevich Kropotkin was born in 1842 and breathed his last in 1921. Kropotkin was a Russian noble. He was educated for army and at the age of twenty he became a military officer in Siberia.

Kropotkin’s great interest in science developed from his military training which he received to get a job. This moulded his life in future. He had a scientific mind and devoted his time and energy to the study of books on science.

As a military officer in Siberia Kropotkin got ample opportunity for geographical survey and expedition. Thus his shift from military service to geo­graphical survey and expeditions enriched the subject profoundly. He contributed many articles to different journals.

Peter Kropotkin was a man of different mentality and attitude. His stay in military service could not satisfy his academic and intellectual requirements and desires and after serving several years he relinquished the job, and entered the University of St. Petersburg in 1867. His vast knowledge in geography brought for him the post of secretary of Geographical Society.

Even this vital administrative post could not detain him for long time. He moved to radical political movements. In 1872, Peter Kropotkin joined the International Workingmen’s Association. Later on he was deeply involved in subversive and anarchical activities. This led him to imprisonment in 1874.

He escaped from prison in 1876 and went to England. The England of the second half of eighteenth century was the centre of revolutionary activities, although she never experienced any revolution.

He also travelled to Switzerland and Paris. While in Paris he was again arrested by the French government in 1883. Released from prison in 1886 he went to England and settled there. While in exile, Kropotkin gave lectures and published widely on anarchism and geography. He returned to Russia after the Russian Revolution in 1917 but was disappointed by the Bolshevik state. The rest of his life was spent without political activity.

Peter Kropotkin was an evolutionist anarchist. But his evolutionism was more scien­tific than that of his predecessors. He wrote several books on anarchism such as ‘The Place of Anarchy in Socialist Evolution (1886), The Conquest of Bread (1888), Its Philosophy and Ideal (1896)’, ‘The State – Its Part in History (1898)’ and ‘Modern Science and Anarchism (1903)’. His deep interest in science, particularly biology and anthro­pology, opened before him new and enchanting vistas of knowledge and all these inspired him to study biological science with added interest.

Megathreads and spaces to hang out:

reminders:

  • 💚 You nerds can join specific comms to see posts about all sorts of topics
  • 💙 Hexbear’s algorithm prioritizes comments over upbears
  • 💜 Sorting by new you nerd
  • 🌈 If you ever want to make your own megathread, you can reserve a spot here nerd
  • 🐶 Join the unofficial Hexbear-adjacent Mastodon instance toots.matapacos.dog

Links To Resources (Aid and Theory):

Aid:

Theory:

  • AmericaDelendaEst [comrade/them]
    ·
    edit-2
    17 days ago

    i have no idea what you are on about

    are you saying people on here are libs supporting him despite his shit opinions or are you saying they're libs for taking him being the shooter at face value or what

    Like I'm sorry I think people taking this guys maid cafe critique as fundamentally being about capitalism are being kind of fucking stupid for no reason, literally no reason to be not normal about this stuff.

    the hexbears I saw commenting on it said maid cafes were weird and misogynistic not "wow I agree with this guy's shit opinions"

    • Huldra [they/them, it/its]
      ·
      edit-2
      17 days ago

      I think a lot of people around the site right now are being genuinely embarrassing in how much good faith they are using to interpret the CEO shooter suspects various weird chud posts and opinions, including one where he suggests among other things that conveyor belt sushi restaurants in japan are part of causing infertility issues due to a loss of customer-waitor interactions.

      Edit: as to your edit, my main point is I think people are going out of their way to interpret his weirdo beliefs that in any other context would be read as being an online chud as instead being fundamentally grounded in theoryless critique of capitalism. And that the embarrassing part of this is that literally none of it is necessary when the core thing people support is just him shooting the CEO, there's no need to steelman his personal beliefs if all anyone cares about is the assassination.

      If he wasnt the guy who shot a CEO I think literally any of the tweets getting posted would be read as bog standard weirdo reactionary-by-osmosis white guy. And ultimately if you're going to be good faithing guys with opinions on Japanese birth rates, I would use that good faith on guys who aren't going to prison and being locked away from all effective organizing.

      • Des [she/her, they/them]
        ·
        17 days ago

        everyone is at different stages of grief right now. been seeing it everywhere not just hexbear including the world of grass