They can still challenge the results, but it looks like its over. 1798 against (1609 to get majority + 1).
It's not over, it's never over, but this was a loss and it does hurt.
They can still challenge the results, but it looks like its over. 1798 against (1609 to get majority + 1).
It's not over, it's never over, but this was a loss and it does hurt.
This article has already morphed a lot since I made this comment, but its original phrasing of "Amazon Workers Defeat Union Drive" and what a "crushing blow" it is to organized labor is gross. No mention of the dropbox fuckery, no explanation of what it means to contest the results or why the union might do that. First several comments pinned by NYT were also about how corrupt unions are. Idk maybe I just have brainworms at this point but it feels like the exact same way they covered any primary that Bernie lost -- unrestrained eagerness to paint the narrative that thing they want to lose (i.e. working people) was just utterly destroyed and has no hopes of recovery.