The Silmarillion is fairly exhaustive, at least in so far as any allegorical pre-history fantasy legend can be. And it was an enjoyable read.
So as far as authorial intent goes, he did at least plan to fix it.
I think the whole "Problem With Orcs" is overstated, particularly in the wake of an ultra-nationalist global conflict. If you consider these monsters the product of historical condition, and acknowledge that they're from the same stock as Elves, you can see them as a culture rather than a race. These are a people who have been born into trauma, surviving it only long enough to inflict it upon their children and their neighbors. They're a physical manifestation of cycles of violence and poverty created by the social structure to which they are born.
While there are no orc characters in JRR Tolkein's work that can explore this concept, there is the character of Gollum. He has also gone through a comparable corruptive change through his exposure to Power, the commission of grisly murders, the subject of horrific physical abuse and isolation, and the obsession with recovery of that Power. He's a very close parallel to an orc in the setting, and presents probably one of the most interesting character-studies in fantasy novels to date.
Orcs being corrupted elves could work along a similar line to Gollum since if I recall Morgoth got to a decent amount of elves before the other Valar entered Arda. That's essentially the stone age for elves so there would be plenty of time for that to work. Doesn't do much to explain what dragons and balrogs are.
It could even be less obvious than that where Arda is 'Morgoth's Ring' in that he poured a decent amount of his essence into the world to corrupt it so if he were to do so more directly to elves then they could even be fed by a desire to recreate the world in their image and the world itself is what drives the orcs into a degree of Gollum esque obsession. I need sources in front of me to bring it all together but that's been my general interpretation (of an incomplete work, head canon is way more acceptable for this kind of thing).
Doesn’t do much to explain what dragons and balrogs are.
Balrogs are corrupted Maia - minor gods, of which Sauron (once called Mairon) was the most powerful. The Balrog that Gandalf faced in the Mines of Moria was, I believe, a corrupted minor god of fire.
Dragons aren't explicitly defined as being derived from anything prior. However, one could surmise they were corrupted versions of some other ancient Mega-fauna of an earlier age.
Incidentally, Trolls are corrupted Ents.
It could even be less obvious than that where Arda is ‘Morgoth’s Ring’ in that he poured a decent amount of his essence into the world to corrupt it so if he were to do so more directly to elves then they could even be fed by a desire to recreate the world in their image and the world itself is what drives the orcs into a degree of Gollum esque obsession. I need sources in front of me to bring it all together but that’s been my general interpretation (of an incomplete work, head canon is way more acceptable for this kind of thing).
Definitely possible. Although, I think the ability to "corrupt" something is simply a power possessed by Valar and Maiar, in line with their power to mold creation as gods. The One Ring just happened to be a vessel for Sauron's god-power, and so the means to corrupt any near it.
The Morgoth's Ring idea came from a letter or something along those lines so it's hardly set in stone. His dominance over Arda for such a long time before the initial intervention of the Valar and the amount of his own energy put into it is similar to what Sauron did with The Ring but on a worldwide scale. So perhaps early elves prior to travelling to Valinor would be easier tempted and the effect be deeper since this happened literally at the beginning of elves being in the world. It seems the higher up in the pantheon you are the greater but less direct your power is. Saurumon could bend people with his voice, Sauron could bend Numenor to his will through manipulation and Morgoth can influence the very fabric of creation but they all take a degree of permanent power invested in doing so.
The Silmarillion is fairly exhaustive, at least in so far as any allegorical pre-history fantasy legend can be. And it was an enjoyable read.
I think the whole "Problem With Orcs" is overstated, particularly in the wake of an ultra-nationalist global conflict. If you consider these monsters the product of historical condition, and acknowledge that they're from the same stock as Elves, you can see them as a culture rather than a race. These are a people who have been born into trauma, surviving it only long enough to inflict it upon their children and their neighbors. They're a physical manifestation of cycles of violence and poverty created by the social structure to which they are born.
While there are no orc characters in JRR Tolkein's work that can explore this concept, there is the character of Gollum. He has also gone through a comparable corruptive change through his exposure to Power, the commission of grisly murders, the subject of horrific physical abuse and isolation, and the obsession with recovery of that Power. He's a very close parallel to an orc in the setting, and presents probably one of the most interesting character-studies in fantasy novels to date.
Orcs being corrupted elves could work along a similar line to Gollum since if I recall Morgoth got to a decent amount of elves before the other Valar entered Arda. That's essentially the stone age for elves so there would be plenty of time for that to work. Doesn't do much to explain what dragons and balrogs are.
It could even be less obvious than that where Arda is 'Morgoth's Ring' in that he poured a decent amount of his essence into the world to corrupt it so if he were to do so more directly to elves then they could even be fed by a desire to recreate the world in their image and the world itself is what drives the orcs into a degree of Gollum esque obsession. I need sources in front of me to bring it all together but that's been my general interpretation (of an incomplete work, head canon is way more acceptable for this kind of thing).
Balrogs are corrupted Maia - minor gods, of which Sauron (once called Mairon) was the most powerful. The Balrog that Gandalf faced in the Mines of Moria was, I believe, a corrupted minor god of fire.
Dragons aren't explicitly defined as being derived from anything prior. However, one could surmise they were corrupted versions of some other ancient Mega-fauna of an earlier age.
Incidentally, Trolls are corrupted Ents.
Definitely possible. Although, I think the ability to "corrupt" something is simply a power possessed by Valar and Maiar, in line with their power to mold creation as gods. The One Ring just happened to be a vessel for Sauron's god-power, and so the means to corrupt any near it.
The Morgoth's Ring idea came from a letter or something along those lines so it's hardly set in stone. His dominance over Arda for such a long time before the initial intervention of the Valar and the amount of his own energy put into it is similar to what Sauron did with The Ring but on a worldwide scale. So perhaps early elves prior to travelling to Valinor would be easier tempted and the effect be deeper since this happened literally at the beginning of elves being in the world. It seems the higher up in the pantheon you are the greater but less direct your power is. Saurumon could bend people with his voice, Sauron could bend Numenor to his will through manipulation and Morgoth can influence the very fabric of creation but they all take a degree of permanent power invested in doing so.