here's the thing you have to understand about my position on the issue: I dont care right now, and at the time I did not care at all. If you can make the PRO act or m4a happen, please make it happen, I dont care how.
the only thing I have a problem with is someone who is so strongheaded about a tactical decision that they're willing to create chaos and disunity.
I have no problem at all with BJG or any other youtuber who was acting sensibly at the time no matter what side they were on.
The people I have a problem with are the ones who create stupid controversies that lead to disunity.
And let me tell you why this matters to me and why it should matter to you: the downfall of the cpusa in the 50s and 60s wasn't exactly caused by cointelpro and the fbi. it was the fault lines that existed amongst them at the time that the fbi and cointelpro exploited. cpusa leaders at the time were so paranoid of trotskyists that they couldn't imagine a greater enemy. hence the fact that at their height, something like 20% of dues paying cpusa members were fbi informants.
this is why we should ask ourselves when agitators start creating controversy, is this person who is creating drama really worth having around?
Are you a member of the DSA or any other organization, comrade? what do you know about the context in which 'the dsa plan' was passed. critiqueing organizational processes without taking on organizational discipline is a form of liberalism.
You could have just stopped at the fact you don't care. Like honestly what is even the point of going on about any of this when you didn't even bother to know the details of what happened? What is the point of endlessly fishing around for ways to discredit people? Is it just so we don't have to acknowledge indifference and apathy aren't actually signifiers of being the big bad arch socialist? I really think on some level people really prefer the narrative that everything is sabotage, grifters and enemy infiltration. It is so much more flattering than saying you didn't try because you didn't care.
So let me explain this one more time(I'm really not trying to create conflict here, I just wanna make sure you understand what I mean.) If we can pass m4a or the pro act, it would be good. I do care about that. What I don't care about is how we do it. So I did not at the time care about the ftv debate. But what I did care for was the fact we were so willing to tear each other apart.
And I damn well know what happened at the time. My contempt for the controversy in no way means I dont know what happened. I was following along the whole thing, and was frustrated (and still am) at the fact that we're so willing to tear each other apart over such inane bullshit as tactical decisions.
I'm also not saying that Dore is sabotaging or infiltrating. I dont believe that. I'm saying he's a leftist in the most shallow sense. As in we dont need him, or anyone who who creates that much controversy. It would be better if we stop empowering folks like him.
but lemme ask you this; do you care how m4a or the pro act is passed? if not, then why do you still care about this? also, do you think the vote would have passed the lower house? If you answer yes to this, idk what to say other than you're wrong. If you answer no, then why do you still care?
here's the thing you have to understand about my position on the issue: I dont care right now, and at the time I did not care at all. If you can make the PRO act or m4a happen, please make it happen, I dont care how.
the only thing I have a problem with is someone who is so strongheaded about a tactical decision that they're willing to create chaos and disunity.
I have no problem at all with BJG or any other youtuber who was acting sensibly at the time no matter what side they were on.
The people I have a problem with are the ones who create stupid controversies that lead to disunity.
And let me tell you why this matters to me and why it should matter to you: the downfall of the cpusa in the 50s and 60s wasn't exactly caused by cointelpro and the fbi. it was the fault lines that existed amongst them at the time that the fbi and cointelpro exploited. cpusa leaders at the time were so paranoid of trotskyists that they couldn't imagine a greater enemy. hence the fact that at their height, something like 20% of dues paying cpusa members were fbi informants.
this is why we should ask ourselves when agitators start creating controversy, is this person who is creating drama really worth having around?
Are you a member of the DSA or any other organization, comrade? what do you know about the context in which 'the dsa plan' was passed. critiqueing organizational processes without taking on organizational discipline is a form of liberalism.
You could have just stopped at the fact you don't care. Like honestly what is even the point of going on about any of this when you didn't even bother to know the details of what happened? What is the point of endlessly fishing around for ways to discredit people? Is it just so we don't have to acknowledge indifference and apathy aren't actually signifiers of being the big bad arch socialist? I really think on some level people really prefer the narrative that everything is sabotage, grifters and enemy infiltration. It is so much more flattering than saying you didn't try because you didn't care.
So let me explain this one more time(I'm really not trying to create conflict here, I just wanna make sure you understand what I mean.) If we can pass m4a or the pro act, it would be good. I do care about that. What I don't care about is how we do it. So I did not at the time care about the ftv debate. But what I did care for was the fact we were so willing to tear each other apart.
And I damn well know what happened at the time. My contempt for the controversy in no way means I dont know what happened. I was following along the whole thing, and was frustrated (and still am) at the fact that we're so willing to tear each other apart over such inane bullshit as tactical decisions.
I'm also not saying that Dore is sabotaging or infiltrating. I dont believe that. I'm saying he's a leftist in the most shallow sense. As in we dont need him, or anyone who who creates that much controversy. It would be better if we stop empowering folks like him.
but lemme ask you this; do you care how m4a or the pro act is passed? if not, then why do you still care about this? also, do you think the vote would have passed the lower house? If you answer yes to this, idk what to say other than you're wrong. If you answer no, then why do you still care?
stop listening to jimmy dore. he's a lib.