iridaniotter [she/her] to the_dunk_tank • edit-21 year ago[CW: bestiality] Professional "moral philosopher" ponders whether it's OK to sexually assault animals, featuring AI artlockNSFWimagemessage-square210 fedilinkarrow-up182file-text
arrow-up182image[CW: bestiality] Professional "moral philosopher" ponders whether it's OK to sexually assault animals, featuring AI artlockNSFWiridaniotter [she/her] to the_dunk_tank • edit-21 year agomessage-square210 Commentsfedilinkfile-text
https://nitter.net/PeterSinger/status/1722440246972018857 No, the art does not depict bestiality, don't worry.
minus-squarem532 [she/her]hexbear12·edit-21 year agoWe won't "return to nature" that would be fascist. Humans will not eat "natural" food. Humans eat industrial food. Thinking "but what if they wouldn't" is fictional. link
minus-squareDoubledee [comrade/them]hexbear6·1 year agoOkay, that ship has sailed in other words. I think he would just object, he's kinda a Graeber guy, but that makes sense to me. Thanks! link
minus-squareDoubledee [comrade/them]hexbear4·1 year agoDunno, I told people I was curious and wasn't here to argue, I could argue anyway but I'm trying to engage in a way that encourages folks to respond. link
![[CW: bestiality] Professional "moral philosopher" ponders whether it's OK to sexually assault animals, featuring AI art](https://hexbear.net/pictrs/image/f26b2dce-7254-4537-acd1-5de623b591e0.png){kind=link}
We won't "return to nature" that would be fascist. Humans will not eat "natural" food. Humans eat industrial food. Thinking "but what if they wouldn't" is fictional.
Okay, that ship has sailed in other words. I think he would just object, he's kinda a Graeber guy, but that makes sense to me. Thanks!
deleted by creator
Dunno, I told people I was curious and wasn't here to argue, I could argue anyway but I'm trying to engage in a way that encourages folks to respond.
deleted by creator
deleted by creator