• grisbajskulor [he/him]
    ·
    3 years ago

    I buy this shit all the time and 100% assumed the "employee owned" tag was total bullshit. This is good to hear!

    But also two things to keep in mind:

    • Consumer choices != politics

    • Posting an article from the company website is a bit dubious. I'd be curious to hear about any criticisms.

    • opposide [none/use name]
      hexagon
      ·
      3 years ago

      The biggest critique I’ve heard is that stocks are not completely equitable in distribution but that’s still better than most

        • SoyViking [he/him]
          ·
          3 years ago

          Stuff like this is why I think giving employees stock is a horrible way of doing employee ownership. Stocks are not equitable.

          Instead of personal stock ownership the business should be owned collectively through a democratic association where every employee had a right to participate and vote at the general assembly, either by the "one man, one vote" or the "one hour of labour, one vote" principle.

        • pooh [she/her, any]
          ·
          3 years ago

          that’s funny, i worked for a company that was majority employee owned and this was the case. nearly all of the stock was owned by a handful of middle managers and that ownership was not extended to “regular” employees.

          This is similar to what I experienced in an ESOP. The CEO was a giant asshole and no one could apparently do anything about it because he and his key supporters apparently owned enough shares to not give a shit about the rest of the company. It was pretty far from anything resembling a workplace democracy.