"We applaud the democratic revolutions that have transformed the former Communist bloc"
I love the rising wave of neo-fascism in eastern europe - National DSA
(many DSA chapters are good and based ok, this post is dunking on the National DSA, not all chapters or the DSA on its entirety)
Because if you don't you can kiss the possibility of growing into a mass movement goodbye.
deleted by creator
Caring about "the truth" more than actually achieving anything is liberalism. I don't give a damn about defending the honor of governments that have been dead for 30 years unless it's helpful to building socialism today.
If you can't see how "the USSR was good, actually" is a horrible recruiting strategy, I don't know what to tell you. Thinking that is just out of touch with the vast majority of the country, and we need an approach that has mass appeal. We can have struggle sessions about Stalin and political freedoms in the Warsaw Pact once we get them in the door, but first we need to get them in the door.
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
Imagine handing people a list of 10 things your political organization believes. 9 of those things are popular, but number 10 is "that Hitler guy wasn't as bad as you might think." It doesn't matter if that's the last thing on your list -- it's going to push away a ton of people who'd otherwise get on board.
That's the reality we're in. There have been decades of "communism = fascism" propaganda specifically to create this problem for us. We can either run headlong into that problem with people who aren't even on board, or we can sidestep it for now and address it later if it becomes necessary.
deleted by creator
We don't know, and given how little Americans care about the rest of the world and history right now, I'd say we probably don't need to relitigate the Cold War to achieve socialism here. We certainly don't need to do it on the FAQ page of a website.
deleted by creator
You can do this in person far easier than you can on an "about us" section of a website. In person you can have a real conversation. On a website you'll just get targeted with shit like that YouTube link of yours.
Why even lead into this conversation if you can avoid it? It's not at all necessary to get people on board with what the DSA is pushing.
deleted by creator
Make people interested and simultaneously trying to unbrainwash 100 years of red scare by text on website? Also, I can make educated guesses what will happen with dsa and so should you, so while it works and people heard of it - comrades should make the most of it.
deleted by creator
So? Their faq documents are completely irrelevant then, only interpersonal agitation matters and connections. Rsdlp joined duma despite thinking it’s irrelevant institution to get a platform, not to endorse tzar
deleted by creator
Yeah, but we have some comrades from dsa taking shots maybe too close (look through the thread), so we should chill :meow-bernie:
deleted by creator
I'm pointing out the difference between a mass media approach and a personal one. What you're suggesting works decently in the latter but poorly in the former.
This isn't walking and chewing gum, it's running a race with a weighted vest. It doesn't matter if you can do OK even if you take on an added challenge -- you'd do better without it.
deleted by creator
Determining who might be receptive to it is impossible in the FAQ section of a website. This is what I mean when I say that the approach you're suggesting does not work in this context.
deleted by creator
deleted by creator