Aren't there sources other than Adrian Zenz to use in this sort of centrist-socialist article? ('Xinjiang oppression is real but stop doing imperialism over it')
Aren't there sources other than Adrian Zenz to use in this sort of centrist-socialist article? ('Xinjiang oppression is real but stop doing imperialism over it')
All the other sources are biased by having actually visited China at some point?
I’m just baffled that it’s so easy to point out how awful he is. You’d think they’d be able to find someone that isn’t a turbo racist.
Maybe they think he'll be more willing to say what the US wants going forward. If they're trying to get that last bit of international support for intervention, they can just tell him to say China is eating Uyghur babies or some shit, whereas more serious researchers might refuse.