Maybe I'm misunderstanding the article, but, to me, it seems to clearly state that this is a murder and cover-up, especially with the fact that it was an anonymous burial with clear identification on the body.
Ah, I mean that's fair, on a re-read, I could see that as fair interpretation, but I also think it could definitely make that kind of implication clearer if it's what they were actually going for.
Now we're dealing with too many layers of ambiguity in language for me to decipher a clear view of the intentions behind everyone's words..
I'm confused, I believe the comment is in earnest?
Maybe I'm misunderstanding the article, but, to me, it seems to clearly state that this is a murder and cover-up, especially with the fact that it was an anonymous burial with clear identification on the body.
Ah, I mean that's fair, on a re-read, I could see that as fair interpretation, but I also think it could definitely make that kind of implication clearer if it's what they were actually going for.
Now we're dealing with too many layers of ambiguity in language for me to decipher a clear view of the intentions behind everyone's words..
I agree. In hindsight, my interpretation may have been more of a representation of my own dry sarcasm, thus the confusion.
deleted by creator