:cringe: :cringe: :cringe: :cringe: :cringe: WHO THE FUCK APPROVED THIS SHIT MARG BAR CAPITALISM :cringe: :cringe: :cringe: :cringe: :cringe:
:cringe: :cringe: :cringe: :cringe: :cringe: WHO THE FUCK APPROVED THIS SHIT MARG BAR CAPITALISM :cringe: :cringe: :cringe: :cringe: :cringe:
Should be noted that Tinder's also seeing a lot of competition in the Dating App market. So they're pivoting from the Grow Your Base model to the Extract Maximum Revenue From Your Regulars model, before finally falling into decline and neglect.
I'm sure plenty of apps with brag about how they don't have these features. And Tinder will counter that not having these features is bad because how can you be a sex pest towards your parasocial crush without paying someone to jam your content in their faces?
In a few years, I'm confident we'll see an Ashley Madison-esque scandal that reveals a bunch of these profiles are completely fake and people have been throwing their money at Chatbots with half-naked women as their avatars.
There's not really "competition" in the dating app market because pretty much everyone who uses one app uses all the apps at some point. I've gotta believe (at least for my own sanity) that the vast majority of users aren't paying any money to use the apps, but I'm probably wrong unfortunately. There's people who pay for coaches and professionals photos to effectively play a video game that they think will get them a bf/gf. Sad all around.
The goal isn't to get a little buy in from lots of people so much as it is to a lot of buy in from a few people. That's the standard model for Free-2-Play-Pay-2-Win games.
Chasing the Whale: Examining the ethics of free-to-play games
...
...
I refuse to believe that anyone has spent more than $100 on dating apps, simply for my own sanity. Any reports of that must be fraud.