The enlightenment era philosophers are ambiguous enough where you can mold them into whatever you'd like. There's stuff within Kant's writing that can't be read as anything except a criticism of what would later be coined as capitalism. Then you have his views on morality which can be seen as diametrically opposed to Marx's analysis of how morality is shaped by material realities
Isn’t he like, a founding conservative ethics guy? Someone told me that Idk if that's legit.
The enlightenment era philosophers are ambiguous enough where you can mold them into whatever you'd like. There's stuff within Kant's writing that can't be read as anything except a criticism of what would later be coined as capitalism. Then you have his views on morality which can be seen as diametrically opposed to Marx's analysis of how morality is shaped by material realities