If you don't post your result you're a liberal

https://arzamas.academy/materials/1269

  • buckykat [none/use name]
    ·
    1 year ago

    I clearly don't know enough about the details of the Russian Revolution for this quiz, I don't know what the political character of the Constituent Assembly or the Dumas were, or what exactly is implied by "a lengthy period of agreement between all democratic forces"

    Anyway, that apparently makes me [to the left of] a left SR

    • panopticon [comrade/them]
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah same, I seem to have misunderstood the question about forming a federal state system as well as the constituent assembly question. Landed myself solidly in the anarchist camp. Not that there's anything wrong with that, but I think I've got some learning to do. Reading recommendations, anyone?

      • ZapataCadabra [he/him]
        ·
        1 year ago

        October by China Mievill is very accessible. Just ignore the epilogue basically, he gets on a very anti Stalin diatribe that feels out of place with the rest of the book.

    • ZapataCadabra [he/him]
      ·
      1 year ago

      October by China Mievill makes it easier to digest all the different factions.

  • Mardoniush [she/her]
    ·
    1 year ago

    Shit I'm a Left SR, it's only a matter of time before I betray you to the reactionary peseantry.

  • Zvyozdochka [she/her, pup/pup's]
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    The only question I got "wrong" was the one about democratization of the army where I selected strongly agree instead of agree, close enough

    Show

    lenin-palace

  • CrushKillDestroySwag
    ·
    1 year ago

    Show

    Aww shit does this mean I'd end up hanging out with Trotsky after the war I hope not

  • alcoholicorn [comrade/them, doe/deer]
    ·
    1 year ago

    Someone should crosspost these somewhere where more libs will see this. I can't imagine how wild your answers would have to be to end up by the guys whose platform consisted into duping people into thinking that communism meant a gradual, lawful reform into capitalism under the tsar.

    Show

    • theposterformerlyknownasgood
      ·
      1 year ago

      the guys whose platform consisted into duping people into thinking that communism meant a gradual, lawful reform into capitalism under the tsar.

      Whomst? It isn't the SRs. It isn't the Mensheviks, or at least not any of the Internationalists, Martov's group (Who were very close to Bolsheviks in outlook), and even the defencists didn't think you could achieve socialism by gradual reform under the tsar.
      It isn't the Cadets, they weren't socialists.

  • MF_COOM [he/him]
    ·
    1 year ago

    Show

    A bunch of nerd shit qs I just selected neutral for

  • HumanBehaviorByBjork [any, undecided]
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    baby i'm an anarchist papyrus-cool

    i like that the top left and bottom right quadrants are just empty. really highlights how this split between "social" and "economic" freedom is a fiction born out of the neoliberal turn. even the most authoritarian stalinite tanko-marxist cares more about freedom than the most coked out crypto libertarian.