for real though, modern linux distros will rarely require you to enter a command line, and if you do, a quick internet search can usually help you find out what you need to enter
for real though, modern linux distros will rarely require you to enter a command line, and if you do, a quick internet search can usually help you find out what you need to enter
The most handy thing about the Linux shell is googling "how do I configure___ " and then someone says "just run this: _____" and you paste it in and you're good.
That said, I'm giving bad advice in that you should never run a command on your computer that you don't understand.
That said, most people just do it anyway and it usually works out, but the more you take your time to dissect a command before hitting Enter, the safer and easier things'll be.
Honestly, my biggest gripe with the terminal is how little info it gives you about what you're about to run.
It would be nice if distros included a decent zsh config with autocomplete, auto-help text, and syntax highlighting.
Does
man command
orcommand --help
not usually do it for you?My needs are met by those and stuff like
tldr
,cheat
&howdoi
, but I am specifically looking for something much more discoverable and inline as I type the command.Basically, I want:
fzf
completions (or any fuzzy searcher w/ previewing)man
beneathtldr
,cheat
,howdoi
,navi
, etcI switched to fish last year, and I haven’t looked back. It feels like so much less of an abomination than zsh or bash, and I’ve barely modified it out of the box. Might be worth a whirl, the completion stuff rocks.
deleted by creator
i used to use fish, but having to translate scripts from POSIX to fish syntax got annoying. great shell otherwise
deleted by creator
ed is the standard text editor
arch's installer has a really nice zsh setup, but it's not installed by default unfortunately
Hmm I'll look into it. I've been having trouble finding anything that meets my desires in terms of autocomplete/suggestions. Right now I'm doing mostly manual configuration because all the plugins are missing something in some regard.
deleted by creator
Agreed. Though, there is a lot of really great stuff in the zsh ecosystem. The problem with zsh (and bash, etc) is the archaic completion system, and all the community stuff is built on top of antiquated decisions.
deleted by creator
totally, most of the time you'll be fine but it's worth learning some of the basic commands (ls, rm, cd, etc.) so you can at least understand what commands do. on systemd-based distros (most of them are these days for those unfamiliar), it's a good idea to learn how to use systemctl as well
Most basic users would only really need to learn apt to fill in the gaps and use GUI stuff for the rest.
Tbf if only ran commands that I understood I wouldn't be able to operate Linux, but I'm probably an edge case anyway.
No I know, like I said everyone does it, but I'd feel bad "officially" condoning it. Hopefully you'll pick up some things along the way.