• Dr_Gabriel_Aby [none/use name]
      ·
      7 months ago

      Leftists in one breath: Down with the empire! down with capitalism.

      Leftist in the next breath: we must keep the sacred borders of the colonial age alive. Humanity must never adapt these borders to the conditions on the ground in the modern day. May the Treaty of Tordisalles and Conference of Berlin live forever! Long Live the Queen and glory to the commonwealth!

      • Adkml [he/him]
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        Leftists in one breath: America is bad because it's a genocidal empire that comes up with flimsy excuses to invade other countries just so they can get their oil

        Leftists in the next breath: here's why it's good this country is invading its neighbor based on a flimsy excuse to justify taking a newly discovered oil deposit

        America doesn't have anything to do with this at the outset and I think its pretty disingenuous to try to paint people concerned about then population of a nation that's about to be invaded fot oil as "being obsessed with borders"

          • Adkml [he/him]
            ·
            7 months ago

            Ok but they literally don't. You can argue there's soft involvement through ExxonMobil but this isn't directly opposing some specific American policy.

            They're clearly gonna use this to get directly involved and make things way worse for venezuala and it's gonna be really really easy for them to point to this as justification for literally directly taking over any oil fields in contention.

            • BurgerPunk [he/him, comrade/them]
              ·
              7 months ago

              You can argue there's soft involvement through ExxonMobil

              I would argue theres complete involvement through ExxonMobil

              • Adkml [he/him]
                ·
                7 months ago

                Well you'd be wrong and youre about to find out what complete involvement actually looks like unfortunately.

                • BurgerPunk [he/him, comrade/them]
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  7 months ago

                  Well you'd be wrong

                  Ok smuglord glad you're around to enlighten us that hegemonic control of resources by a US company through US imperialism backed by US military is only "soft involvment" in Guyana

                  • Adkml [he/him]
                    ·
                    7 months ago

                    Lmao ok you're right, this is a good idea that will work out well for venezuala with no repurcussions and America deffinitly will not use this as an excuse to be more antagonistic. After all they're already doing everything they can to be completely involved.

                    I thought I had a good point but then you depicted me as a smug emoji so obviously you've won.

                    • BurgerPunk [he/him, comrade/them]
                      ·
                      7 months ago

                      I thought I had a good point but then you depicted me as a smug emoji so obviously you've won

                      I mean yeah, obviously ppb-gigachad

                • usa_suxxx [they/them]
                  ·
                  7 months ago

                  We just had the USA try to offer concessions to get Venezuelan oil after their bungled Ukrainian war caused intense shortages after 2 decades of trying to get their oil colony, Venezuela, back and now they magically aren't involved in turning their neighbor into an oil colony in contested territory. Think critically fr

            • Krause [he/him]@lemmygrad.ml
              ·
              edit-2
              7 months ago

              soft involvement through ExxonMobil

              I wouldn't call influencing the ICJ to steal disputed territory from a country and then threatening intervention if they defend themselves "soft"

            • Muad'Dibber@lemmygrad.ml
              ·
              7 months ago

              The US attacks and sanctions on VZ are all in our heads apparently. They have no interest in the region according to you.

              • Adkml [he/him]
                ·
                7 months ago

                I guess I missed the part where Guyana was the one that imposed those sanctions.

        • Dr_Gabriel_Aby [none/use name]
          ·
          7 months ago

          Guyana is dominated by Exxon Mobil, they have captured the government and in some ways are becoming the government in Guyana. Guyanas economy is 50 times smaller than Exxon Mobil. Exxon Mobil has a history of being involved in killings of thousands of environmentalists and indigenous people in Latin America.

          Guyana is not sanctioned and in no part of their agreement with Exxon Mobil have they agreed to build roads or infrastructure or even a single bridge to cross the river Esquibo and connect the region to the rest of Guyana.

          The only reason the borders are the way they are is because of British Imperial aims to limit the chances of a United Latin American state in the regions of Bolivar.

          Also you have to remind me. What is the name of the largest oil company in America? Do you think America maybe has some sort of connection to Exxon Mobil, or do you really think they are entirely removed from decisions.

        • LesbianLiberty [she/her]
          ·
          7 months ago

          madeline-smug "Clearly this has nothing to do with the US. If only Venezuela would follow my advice, then they would truly be lead towards a liberatory society"

          • Adkml [he/him]
            ·
            7 months ago

            Didn't realize "don't invade other countries to take their oil" was a super niche concept I had just come up with. Thought that was like, the main criticism of the last 40 years of americas foreign policy. Not sure why it's not a bad thing all of the sudden I guess.

            • LesbianLiberty [she/her]
              ·
              7 months ago

              There's been many invasions which have had minimal bloodshed, some tanks and infantry here and without a fight suddenly this land's annexed; if the US isn't willing to defend it's puppet then who cares. Clearly it would be if this was all over the news like it would normally be, but no, it's not all over the news, so the US is by all likelihood not going to do anything because it's already bogged down enough. It's not good or bad, this is simply just political maneuvering and the culmination of a history I will admit I don't and you clearly don't understand. Testing every global south liberation project for purity is meaningless and unhelpful, and showing your whole ass by equivocating nearly a hundred years of American sponsored global terror with what appears to be a bloodless landgrab does nothing except show you don't trust nor understand those who are in global south liberation projects.

              I don't know if it's good or bad, but I know me caring won't matter, and I understand that socialist projects aren't perfect in the real world.

              Show

              • Adkml [he/him]
                ·
                7 months ago

                Yea didn't read past you opining for just a peaceful bloodless invasion of another country.

                Maybe all the troops will be home by Christmas.