• Awoo [she/her]
    ·
    3 years ago

    Partly I agree. However, things like the great replacement are literally intended to make people believe material conditions are different to what they actually are in reality.

    I don't think this can all be put down to some people being alienated. Many of these people are petty-bourgeoise and extremely comfortable economically. Contrary to popular belief many of the people in Gamergate are sadly the kind of people that are getting laid, I am willing to bet there's a strong crossover in that crowd with the abusive pickupartist crowd that was equally popular at that moment in time.

    I strongly believe there's a case to be made for false-material-conditions to be a thing in the same way false consciousness is a thing. If you can make people believe their situation is precarious and that they are being threatened by something then you are creating the material conditions that exist in their mind. It's like manufacturing consent, except it's manufactured conditions.

    • NaturalsNotInIt [any]
      ·
      3 years ago

      In some cases, it's a matter of perspective. If you're one of those comfortable, but downwardly mobile petit-boug, the "great replacement" is exaggerated, but it is material reality for people in that situation. That doesn't mean we should listen to them (they should be completely gutted/GULAGed like the Kulaks), but just saying "they're delusional/lost" makes it harder to oppose them.

    • mittens [he/him]
      ·
      3 years ago

      The petite bourgeoisie is the one that will rapidly move towards reaction as soon as material conditions start to press on them. I think they are comfortable but I also think they're in constant danger of being proletarized, which is what they most fear