I think Pollock was just doing a bit. Like, he was expressing himself in a clearly uninterpretable way, like dashing random keys while typing. Then, he saw people freak out about how it "wasn't art" but they couldn't explain why it wasn't. Finally, rich snobs spent millions on nonsense they could have made themselves, and pretended to know what it was. Like when Andy Warhol made painting with piss just to get a rise out of people.
In my opinion, art is anything made to express a feeling or concept. How good it is depends on various factors, but if someone is trying to communicate their feelings or some thought, it is art.
I think Pollock was just doing a bit. Like, he was expressing himself in a clearly uninterpretable way, like dashing random keys while typing. Then, he saw people freak out about how it "wasn't art" but they couldn't explain why it wasn't. Finally, rich snobs spent millions on nonsense they could have made themselves, and pretended to know what it was. Like when Andy Warhol made painting with piss just to get a rise out of people.
Art is anything that you can convince someone else is art
In my opinion, art is anything made to express a feeling or concept. How good it is depends on various factors, but if someone is trying to communicate their feelings or some thought, it is art.
deleted by creator