but why? you'll still measure things in football fields, elephants or "large boulders" so it won't affect you much
Gotcha questions like this (eg "should we ban dihydromonoxide") are supposed to show us not to jump to conclusions, but I'm guessing the people voting no on this one aren't taking much away from it
Imperial mesure and Roman numerals fits good in this dystopic redneck country
To be fair the system is hindu arabic.
Closer to hindu १२३ than arabic ١٢٣
Im guessing the "No" makes a bell curve of those who know and those that dont
Ah yes, 2,313 people, otherwise known as a representative sample 350 million.
Edit: I'm not respond to the morons who think someone's FB status poll is representative of America.
2000 can absolutely be a representative sample size. The bigger worry here is sampling bias rather than sample size.
Tell me you don’t know statistics without saying it specifically.
