Haste_Hall [he/him] to the_dunk_tank • edit-23 years agoI see a lot of y'all joining forces with Fox criticizing a house, but why are you so-called Marxists not criticizing Dan for using a lens he doesn't need? Hmmm?external-linkmessage-square85 fedilinkarrow-up197file-text
arrow-up197external-linkI see a lot of y'all joining forces with Fox criticizing a house, but why are you so-called Marxists not criticizing Dan for using a lens he doesn't need? Hmmm?Haste_Hall [he/him] to the_dunk_tank • edit-23 years agomessage-square85 Commentsfedilinkfile-text
minus-squareSlowpoke [none/use name]hexbear4·3 years agoLuxury home ownership is the issue here. It's very bad optics. It looks a lot like joining the enemy, or at least giving aid and comfort to the enemy. link
minus-squareMardoniush [she/her]hexbear8·3 years agoSerious "Bernie has a Dacha" vibes here. We're never going to win if we subscribe to the same moral calculus as the enemy. The point is to destroy capitalist morality, not beat them at it. link
minus-squareitsPina [he/him, she/her]hexbear7·3 years agoIt's not bad optics we all deserve luxury homes luxury homes are good optics link
Luxury home ownership is the issue here. It's very bad optics. It looks a lot like joining the enemy, or at least giving aid and comfort to the enemy.
Serious "Bernie has a Dacha" vibes here.
We're never going to win if we subscribe to the same moral calculus as the enemy. The point is to destroy capitalist morality, not beat them at it.
It's not bad optics we all deserve luxury homes luxury homes are good optics