Permanently Deleted

  • Alaskaball [comrade/them]A
    ·
    1 year ago

    It hits different for me since I will scrutinize almost any internet cult & I see people assembling this stuff into reading lists alongside basic marxists texts with zero african or latin american writers. They play their word games and come out swinging against the periphery because they focus on media criticism

    Are you talking about including the writers of the Oscar Meyer wieners school, the irrationalist philosophers, or the ethno-nationalist philosophers mentioned in your article?

    I used to love doing Citations Needed type stuff but you really see the shortcomings of this practice after a few major events happen and people are left stranded, biting into Ukrainian nationalist and Zionist narratives

    I feel this one. I've just gotten exhausted over major events happening every other week.

    • voight [he/him, any]
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Here's an example reading list:

      The Society of the Spectacle (1967) by Guy Debord

      The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction (1936) by Walter Benjamin

      The Culture Industry from Dialectic of Enlightenment (1944) by Theodore Adorno & Max Horkheimer

      Discipline and Punish (1975) by Michel Foucault

      Simulacra and Simulation (1981) by Jean Baudrillard

      Manufacturing Consent (1988) by Edward S. Herman & Noam Chomsky

      The Sublime Object of Ideology (1989) by Slavoj Zizek

      Postscript on the Societies of Control (1990) by Gilles Deleuze

      Postmodernism, or, the Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism (1991) by Fredric Jameson

      Spectres of Marx (1993) by Jacques Derrida

      Capitalist Realism (2009) by Mark Fisher