From Google: "5G Ultra Wideband, Verizon's millimeter wavelength (mmWave)-based 5G, operates at frequencies of about 28 GHz and 39GHz."
From pdf: "A 1992 Russian study found that frequencies in the range 53-78GHz (that which 5G proposes to use)
impacted the heart rate variability (an indicator of stress) in rats. Another Russian study on frogs
who’s skin was exposed to MMWs found heart rate changes (arrhythmias). "
Point me to a part of the pdf that demonstrates 5G being dangerous. Just one of the sources or paragraphs. I've read the whole thing, and found nothing yet.
From Google: “5G Ultra Wideband, Verizon’s millimeter wavelength (mmWave)-based 5G, operates at frequencies of about 28 GHz and 39GHz.”
From pdf: "A 1992 Russian study found that frequencies in the range 53-78GHz (that which 5G proposes to use) impacted the heart rate variability (an indicator of stress) in rats. Another Russian study on frogs who’s skin was exposed to MMWs found heart rate changes (arrhythmias). "
5G doesn't run at "dangerous" frequencies, therefore it's not dangerous.
BS article with no evidence! Most likely funded by big tech
https://www.aph.gov.au/DocumentStore.ashx?id=d038a736-ceb1-4287-b6bb-d13dcadc1fb4&subId=672825
The premise of the pdf does not support the claim that 5G is dangerous, rejected as evidence
Removed by mod
None of the pdf uses studies relating to 5G implementations or 5G frequencies, and links to studies are sparse
Doesn't mean anything.
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
No?
The pdf makes several wrong claims (particularly about frequencies used by 5G) and then fails to back up the claim with actual evidence...
Prove it.
From Google: "5G Ultra Wideband, Verizon's millimeter wavelength (mmWave)-based 5G, operates at frequencies of about 28 GHz and 39GHz."
From pdf: "A 1992 Russian study found that frequencies in the range 53-78GHz (that which 5G proposes to use) impacted the heart rate variability (an indicator of stress) in rats. Another Russian study on frogs who’s skin was exposed to MMWs found heart rate changes (arrhythmias). "
Literally right there if you cared to read.
None of this disproves 5G's deadliness.
None of the pdf proves it, like I said
Wrong.
Point me to a part of the pdf that demonstrates 5G being dangerous. Just one of the sources or paragraphs. I've read the whole thing, and found nothing yet.
Point me to something that proves it isn't.
Can't prove a negative dude. You made the claim it's dangerous, provide evidence
Provide evidence it's not. You can't.
Provide evidence it is and i'll provide evidence it isn't :)
You first.
Ok, my previous post did it:
From Google: “5G Ultra Wideband, Verizon’s millimeter wavelength (mmWave)-based 5G, operates at frequencies of about 28 GHz and 39GHz.”
From pdf: "A 1992 Russian study found that frequencies in the range 53-78GHz (that which 5G proposes to use) impacted the heart rate variability (an indicator of stress) in rats. Another Russian study on frogs who’s skin was exposed to MMWs found heart rate changes (arrhythmias). "
5G doesn't run at "dangerous" frequencies, therefore it's not dangerous.
your turn
Like I thought you commies can't prove shit.
deleted by creator
I literally did 10 seconds of research and debunked the pdf dude, which is more than you've accomplished XD
Let that be a lesson: don't be a cretin on main