I love how people can just totally move on from this stuff and find a new obsession without really thinking about it at all
And like within weeks they memory hole ever having thought about that kind of thing. It's truly incredible.
There was even the guy who suicide bombed nashville on christmas day because of 5G conspiracies lol. Going back to the articles now, it's... interesting how profusely the FBI are quoted saying nonono it wasn't terrorism
That goddamn Christmas Day AT&T bomber took out my goddamn Spaghetti Factory too.
When you have radical energy but for all the wrong reasons.
government and private industry pollutes the environment for centuries
"WHY ARE PEOPLE GETTING CANCER IT MUST BE THE CELL TOWERS"
americans are used to thinking of everything as personal responsibility and exchange. You get cancer because you smoked, you get cancer because you eat red meat, it's your fault/a price you pay to do a task.
Midgley damaged the atmosphere more than any single organism in history but also had one of its most ironic deaths
yeah reading up on him he almost sounds more responsible! (at least for the lead)
In 2011, a study backed by the United Nations estimated that the removal of TEL had resulted in $2.4 trillion in annual benefits, and 1.2 million fewer premature deaths.[6]
holy shit!!!!!!
Don't tarnish the name of the luddites like that, the luddites were based
Lmao did you listen to that recent episode of Rev Left too? I just learned that this morning.
So you expect me to believe you're just a cool guy who knows things?
:soviet-hmm:
they were doing it in england and Germany, where Huawei was building. America is the most dumbass anti-science conspiracy brained nation in the world, if people were burning 5g towers, it would've started in America, unless the whole movement in europe was a pysop promoted by the CIA to curb Chinese infrastructure projects.
https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/observations/we-have-no-reason-to-believe-5g-is-safe/
BS article with no evidence! Most likely funded by big tech
https://www.aph.gov.au/DocumentStore.ashx?id=d038a736-ceb1-4287-b6bb-d13dcadc1fb4&subId=672825
The premise of the pdf does not support the claim that 5G is dangerous, rejected as evidence
None of the pdf uses studies relating to 5G implementations or 5G frequencies, and links to studies are sparse
The pdf makes several wrong claims (particularly about frequencies used by 5G) and then fails to back up the claim with actual evidence...
From Google: "5G Ultra Wideband, Verizon's millimeter wavelength (mmWave)-based 5G, operates at frequencies of about 28 GHz and 39GHz."
From pdf: "A 1992 Russian study found that frequencies in the range 53-78GHz (that which 5G proposes to use) impacted the heart rate variability (an indicator of stress) in rats. Another Russian study on frogs who’s skin was exposed to MMWs found heart rate changes (arrhythmias). "
Literally right there if you cared to read.
Point me to a part of the pdf that demonstrates 5G being dangerous. Just one of the sources or paragraphs. I've read the whole thing, and found nothing yet.
Can't prove a negative dude. You made the claim it's dangerous, provide evidence
Ok, my previous post did it:
From Google: “5G Ultra Wideband, Verizon’s millimeter wavelength (mmWave)-based 5G, operates at frequencies of about 28 GHz and 39GHz.”
From pdf: "A 1992 Russian study found that frequencies in the range 53-78GHz (that which 5G proposes to use) impacted the heart rate variability (an indicator of stress) in rats. Another Russian study on frogs who’s skin was exposed to MMWs found heart rate changes (arrhythmias). "
5G doesn't run at "dangerous" frequencies, therefore it's not dangerous.
your turn
I literally did 10 seconds of research and debunked the pdf dude, which is more than you've accomplished XD
