• comi [he/him]
    ·
    3 years ago

    I yet to see any evidence, it’s same limited evidence garbage.

    Give me graph of frequency vs cancer incidence in rats at least

      • comi [he/him]
        ·
        3 years ago

        1.5-6 watts per kilogram

        I don’t sit on 100 watt antennas usually

          • comi [he/him]
            ·
            edit-2
            3 years ago

            Got that hot ass and cancer after 2 years of heating my ass with equivalent of a light bulb of heat, or prolly 10000 phones

            • Shrek
              ·
              edit-2
              3 years ago

              deleted by creator

              • comi [he/him]
                ·
                3 years ago

                Nah it’s not microwave equivalent, but still a little bit much, cause rats are so small, they don’t have small spot with that energy near ear, their entire body is irradiated. I think that article is fair enough, they just don’t know what happens, and levels are much higher than typical (unless you talk on an old phone for 5 hours a day), they are at least 10-50 times higher than normal

      • read_freire [they/them]
        ·
        3 years ago

        These studies did not investigate the types of RFR used for Wi-Fi or 5G networks.

      • comi [he/him]
        ·
        3 years ago

        I trust physics, unless proven otherwise. Their methodology for increased incidence of glioma is absolute garbage, they rely on recollection and don’t control for biases.

        Boohoo, person frequently using his phone is also likely to sit a lot, live in a city.

    • comi [he/him]
      ·
      3 years ago

      It’s an opinion piece in sciam, they publish basically anything

        • comi [he/him]
          ·
          3 years ago

          Sciam has gone to shit :deeper-sadness: they still have nice scipop articles here and there though