Three_Magpies [he/him]

  • 25 Posts
  • 1.49K Comments
Joined 4 years ago
cake
Cake day: March 1st, 2021

help-circle

  • That was what helped me realize how ridiculous the sub was. That they considered it a victory for the workers every time some disphit techbro bragged about doubling his salary by changing his cakewalk job. It just looked like a hug box / sneer club to me. As I said before: a place for liberals to get their dopamine hits + use that moral outrage to think of themselves as radical despite not being part of any political project.


  • It’s not the same as being in person. It’s time-asynchronous, you aren’t using body language or tonality to communicate, and your level of investment is significantly lower. Compare going to hang out a neighbor’s house vs. texting them on social media. One of those is a bigger investment than the other, and people feel it.

    If you enjoy living like this, whatever. It seems to be the new normal they want for us. But with the ‘ease’ of communication comes a drawback imo: i don’t think we care the same for someone we’ve only met online. For working together? It’ll be fine. For recruiting them into a risky political project? I doubt it will be very effective.


  • Three_Magpies [he/him]topoliticsInflation is good actually
    ·
    3 years ago

    The 'inflation is good' stance around here drives me bananas. Like yeah, bread and gasoline and entertainment is now WAY more expensive and my wages haven't gone up but, conceptually, some investment banker is sweating because his APY% changed slightly. I've heard that rent is 21% more expensive since the pandemic -- it frustrates me to hear people talk about inflation like it's a good thing that benefits me.


  • I take a very dim view of online-only political work. Maybe those workers did feel good when reading examples of small victories. But there's no next level -- all they're doing is feeling good and righteous from reading stories, some of which were probably fake.

    What's the alternative? In-person stuff: tenants unions are something I'm impressed by right now -- stuff that gets you moving and meeting people in real life with real stakes. You could argue 'well we can do both' but I don't see the online stuff as leading anywhere.

    To me, it's like the belief that, "Oh, canvassing for politicians is useful because it teaches people social / organizational skills!" But the situation of asking someone to vote for Bernie Sanders are much different than asking them to participate in a rent strike or direct action. Antiwork is similar to my mind, as would be campaigning for Bernie Sanders. You'd probably even hear the same sort arguments from its advocates: "Maybe this won't get us up the hill, specifically, but we're building the possibility of something in the future."


  • Fierce disagree. Putting aside the almost inevitable fact it would be overrun by feds / liberals (assuming it wasn't from the get-go!), I don't see value in a bunch of atomized people logging onto a surveilled website and getting their dopamine hits by reading about how much it sucks to work at Walmart.

    It had quite a lot of smug libs who boasted about making $80k - $200k+ for their do-nothing jobs -- people who are a billion times more likely to support a rightwing project than a leftwing one. It's a loss in the sense that Warren ending her campaign was a loss, imo.









  • Three_Magpies [he/him]tophilosophyBase 🔄 Superstructure
    ·
    3 years ago

    It is a fundamentally new thing. It’s a super machine that can sniff every interaction every person has on one of the most-used communication platforms. And it can robo-police all media with minimal human input and maximum effect on the downstream — that’s dystopian enough for me to call it a new thing even if media has been censored in the past.




  • They squandered their first 100 days ‘negotiating’ with a bad-faith actor who only told them no and would, as a rule, give them 20% of whatever they asked for.

    It made them look irredeemably weak. Now, people are suffering and there’s a very clear group to blame: the Democrats who couldn’t deliver results with a fucking trifecta.

    The comfie libs won’t hear it; their income properties continue to appreciate and I understand most of them got raises. But it’s a lousy place to be if you are trying to run on the D ticket in 2022.


  • I think the Democrats split the bill. Infrastructure bill passed, investing an amount of money that’s less than 1/3rd of California’s GDP for a single year then making the entire country draw from that pool over the course of ten years.

    The Infrastructure Bill will widen highways and probably stuff pork in a lot of pockets. But the Build Back Better Bill was where they put all their aspirational stuff then got humiliated for months by Manchin as he told them, “No, mothers and children must starve because of the deficit.” They licked boot and compromised and demeaned themselves and now they’ll get nothing.

    Quelle surprise



  • Three_Magpies [he/him]tochapotraphouseWhat
    ·
    3 years ago

    I’m saying the concern might be felt honestly, but why does the person feel that way?

    Did they have a bad experience on public transit, or maybe they had several bad experiences that drove them away? Sometimes. Mostly, the people who tell me how bad the public transit are people who haven’t taken it in years.

    Around here, only poor / lower income workers take public transit. I’m told about the most heinous shit that I never see in all my days of riding by the people who wouldn’t take a bus as a last resort. For these reasons, I feel that the concern over public transit is a way of disciplining poor people and calling them criminals.