what is actually in Protocols? I always assumed it was absolute nonsense, just every inane "omg teh Joos invented black people to steal our Pure Hwaite Women and then when the :lmayo: Race is weakest they summon the Antichrist for maximum damage" white supremacist conspiracy theory wrapped into one, but I honestly don't know what it's about
edit: I am not in any way, shape, or form suggesting that Protocols is something other than nonsense, I want to make that abundantly clear. But I would like to be able to better identify and understand when chuds are making more insidious arguments informed by systematic and organized antisemitic propaganda, or if they're just doing Q-tier ranting
Glad to hear my initial assessment wasn't far off. Engaging directly with hate screeds sounds kinda exhausting right now, so I'll either wait until later to read it or try and find other, more detached commentary, but thanks for the link anyway.
what is actually in Protocols? I always assumed it was absolute nonsense, just every inane "omg teh Joos invented black people to steal our Pure Hwaite Women and then when the :lmayo: Race is weakest they summon the Antichrist for maximum damage" white supremacist conspiracy theory wrapped into one, but I honestly don't know what it's about
edit: I am not in any way, shape, or form suggesting that Protocols is something other than nonsense, I want to make that abundantly clear. But I would like to be able to better identify and understand when chuds are making more insidious arguments informed by systematic and organized antisemitic propaganda, or if they're just doing Q-tier ranting
it pretty much reads like a collection of every idea that an antisemite's ever pinched off. mixed in with shoddy lies about Jews is an expression of a worldview which totally equates capitalism, communism, and Judaism. It really underlines the definition of antisemitism as "the socialism of fools."
Glad to hear my initial assessment wasn't far off. Engaging directly with hate screeds sounds kinda exhausting right now, so I'll either wait until later to read it or try and find other, more detached commentary, but thanks for the link anyway.