Please elaborate.

Edit : o7 for your answers comrades!

  • Sabocat [none/use name]
    hexagon
    ·
    3 years ago

    I’m looking for people to define their understanding of it for me, but in particular I am wondering if people on this site are like, “I’m very concerned about freedom of speech!” Which I am finding, is probably just the reactionary way.

    • GoroAkechi [he/him]
      ·
      3 years ago

      Well, I think that a nominal protection of speech is necessary for a government to provide. While I’m a slightly more authoritarian leftist than I was years ago, I still don’t think it’s necessary or beneficial for a country to silence certain forms of dissent. I don’t see this happening in socialist countries anyways, so I’m not too concerned.

      • 420blazeit69 [he/him]
        ·
        3 years ago

        Keep in mind "authoritarian" is not "the government doing stuff." That's how it's usually used, so it's an easy trap to fall into.

        If "authoritarian" has any worthwhile meaning, it would involve use of power that's arbitrary, unjustified, extreme, or against the public interest. There are many restrictions on speech that don't check these boxes.

          • 420blazeit69 [he/him]
            ·
            3 years ago

            As "more central state control." Centralized does not imply arbitrary, unjustified, extreme, or against the public interest. It can often be the opposite of those.