What practical purpose could AOC serve if not to “performatively” vote for things that are unquestionably bad?
Well, there's this $3.5T infrastructure bill that she's got a slice of. Would be a shame if her share got accidentally nixed from the legislation because she couldn't vote for Palestinian Baby Murder.
That's the practical purpose of any House Rep. Sending money back to your district.
Different Rep means different priorities. Crowley likely would have commanded a larger chunk, but you can guarantee he'd be throwing more of his share at AIPAC special interests in order to climb the ladder.
Well, there's this $3.5T infrastructure bill that she's got a slice of. Would be a shame if her share got accidentally nixed from the legislation because she couldn't vote for Palestinian Baby Murder.
That's the practical purpose of any House Rep. Sending money back to your district.
Notably, this objective could be accomplished just as well if her predecessor was still in office
Different Rep means different priorities. Crowley likely would have commanded a larger chunk, but you can guarantee he'd be throwing more of his share at AIPAC special interests in order to climb the ladder.