But that won't happen in the current sydtem. Even if Indian tribes were genuinely trying to set up socialist communes on the land and there wasn't a self interested bourgeois interest in sight, the handover would be from the US government and involve the creation of subnational governmental entities within it's territory. There is no way in hell the US would allow a non capitalist alternative to exist within it's own borders in direct competition with itself.
It's either going to be a bourgeois compromise with an empowered minority of the native population getting all the resources, or the US government essentially has to experience a revolution.
I mean the idea is that a socialist society is created on the land. It won't be privately owned by a couple landlords lol
What capitalist realism does to a person
?
But that won't happen in the current sydtem. Even if Indian tribes were genuinely trying to set up socialist communes on the land and there wasn't a self interested bourgeois interest in sight, the handover would be from the US government and involve the creation of subnational governmental entities within it's territory. There is no way in hell the US would allow a non capitalist alternative to exist within it's own borders in direct competition with itself.
It's either going to be a bourgeois compromise with an empowered minority of the native population getting all the resources, or the US government essentially has to experience a revolution.
I think it would have to come from a revolution lol, 0% chance the US would give up land without it