how the fuck are they gonna solve that without another revolution

edit: this is a genuine question btw, not supposed to be a "gotcha"

  • KobaCumTribute [she/her]
    ·
    3 years ago

    How many of those are coops or literally just a single person who owns their own capital, though?

    • s0ykaf [he/him]
      ·
      3 years ago

      now that's a good question, i have no idea

            • solaranus
              ·
              1 year ago

              deleted by creator

            • s0ykaf [he/him]
              ·
              3 years ago

              if you're thinking about stopping at capitalism, then yes, family ownership is better

              if you're thinking about moving towards socialism, it's the opposite, at least for marx

              which is why he said in the manifesto, and then repeated 27 years later in the critique of the gotha program, that the concentration of property was actually a good thing for a scientific socialist, as it moved people from an inherently reactionary class (petty bourgeoisie) to a revolutionary one (wage worker) - meaning that the more heightened the contradictions, the closer we are to socialism

                • s0ykaf [he/him]
                  ·
                  3 years ago

                  if the class struggle isn't over after the revolution, then how is the class composition of the country not relevant? how is that not gonna get in the way of socializing the means of production? how are we going to abolish the commodity form of any sector without taking into account millions of people whose bills are paid by profiting from that sector instead of receiving wages?