https://twitter.com/jeremythunder/status/1448768005488447491?t=lm9kfyRqn0OPk3s6ODbhnA&s=19

https://twitter.com/HugoTheCat3/status/1448859734350696448?t=lm9kfyRqn0OPk3s6ODbhnA&s=19

  • axont [she/her, comrade/them]
    ·
    3 years ago

    I don't wanna sound like some kind of pearl clutching suburbanite, but goddamn. Out of all the spectacles America has shat out I think I hate the true crime stuff the most. It's genuinely horrifying to me. I hate how it's always framed, not as some kind of unfortunate breakdown of society or a failure of mental health services, instead true crime revels in the gore and morbidity. It's just sick and romanticizes people like Jeffrey Dahmer or Ted Bundy. We're so sick we've turned serial murder into a fandom on the level of Harry Potter and Hamilton.

    The conclusion is always the same but I've rarely heard it brought up. That is, these serial murderers are symptoms of white supremacist cops and a failure of mental healthcare. Last Podcast on the Left has mentioned it occasionally.

    I don't know how to express my hatred of this particular obsession without sounding pretentious. I swear I like other fun stuff like violent video games and heavy metal.

    • invalidusernamelol [he/him]
      ·
      3 years ago

      I only started listening to lpotl when Dave Anthony endorsed them, and while there the best True Crime podcast, that's like being the best smelling dumpster fire.

      At least they bring up mental health and police not often than others.

    • spacecadet [he/him]
      ·
      3 years ago

      I think about a decade ago I went on a Youtube documentary binge learning about all the well known US serial killers since I was unaware. I don't think it is that uncommon for people to be morbidly curious about this stuff?

      I can't speak for the newer podcasts like Serial tho since I haven't listened. They do seem more explicitly exploitative in how they are structured.

      • axont [she/her, comrade/them]
        ·
        edit-2
        3 years ago

        Oh yeah, there's a difference between morbid curiosity and whatever the hell this is. There are real reasons for wanting to research murders and other grisly things. There's a lot to learn. I've researched Charles Manson over and over so I'm in the same boat as you are. I don't know how to put my specific complaint into words. What I hate is that "serial killer obsessive" is a kind of cultural aesthetic one can adopt similar to enjoying sports or watching Star Trek. That part is ludicrous.

      • andy [he/him]
        ·
        3 years ago

        Yep, they avoid soyfacing over all the grisly details. They also have a nice variety of topics like cults and aliens to break up some of the darker stuff

        • PaulSmackage [he/him, comrade/them]
          ·
          3 years ago

          Also, they point out that none of the people they cover are "dark, twisted, masterminds", but horrific people with no redeeming qualities.

    • GreenTeaRedFlag [any]
      ·
      3 years ago

      It's absolutely sick and the people who watch/listen to it should be ashamed. They are not helping society, they are not helping themselves, they are vultures enjoying the death of their fellow humans.

      • axont [she/her, comrade/them]
        ·
        3 years ago

        That's a bit harsher than what I'd say. I'd put more blame on whatever's causing this cultural phenomenon, like capitalism or alienation or background noise white supremacy. The people obsessed with true crime are just putting a podcast on or watching a TV show, same as a lot of folks. They don't intuit it as different than any other form of entertainment and why would they? We're all sitting on graves and enjoying the fruits of imperialism. The fans are only damaging their own psyches from listening, but that's the position we're all in. I can't say I'm much better in regard to my humanity than the true crime fans, I laugh when conservative radio hosts die of covid or when cops kill themselves.

        • GreenTeaRedFlag [any]
          ·
          3 years ago

          When you laugh at cops and conservative hosts, those are active enemies you are laughing at. They are opposed to you, and have hurt you. Watching a serial killer attack someone, or listening to an account of it, for entertainment and not to learn something abut society or what exactly happened, is taking pleasure in the pain and death of another. People should notice this and that it is wrong.

          • axont [she/her, comrade/them]
            ·
            3 years ago

            I think we might be headbutting a weird grey zone of personal morality and cultural phenomenon that doesn't have an easy answer. People obsess over whatever spectacles exist in the current moment. The entertainment that's given to them is perceived as what's available.

            Someone who has read more Debord or Althusser or someone could probably say what I'm struggling to put into words.

            • emizeko [they/them]
              ·
              edit-2
              3 years ago

              I haven't read those but when you are hyperindividualized and "the protagonist of your own movie" and the hedonic treadmill is robbing you of pleasure, it seems like there's a certain type of person who can only still "get off" by self-inserting themselves as the victim in these stories

      • twitter [any]
        ·
        3 years ago

        capitalist exploitation and ecocide of the whole planet: :comfy:

        someone somewhere is listening to a true crime podcast: :honk-enraged:

        • GreenTeaRedFlag [any]
          ·
          3 years ago

          I can be upset by more than one thing at a time, believe it or not. If I saw one man shoot a hospital and another trip a child and laugh at him, I would be upset by both.

          • twitter [any]
            ·
            edit-2
            3 years ago

            Calling thousands of completely normal people "vultures enjoying death" who "are not helping society" and who "should be ashamed of themselves" for consuming media you don't personally approve of is peak internet discourse but :honk-enraged: away I guess

            • GreenTeaRedFlag [any]
              ·
              3 years ago

              Don't think someone who 1. Accused me of a position/priority list I didn't have from a single comment 2. Implied I didn't care enough about a big problem because I voiced an opinion about another problem and 3. Switched arguments mid-roll can really accuse anyone else of being peak internet discourse. All that aside, what's even your point here? It's not something i just don't like or approve of, I've stated pretty clearly it's actively harmful. Are you going to argue that they aren't deriving pleasure from other people's pain and suffering, or that this is somehow helping society?

                • GreenTeaRedFlag [any]
                  ·
                  3 years ago

                  dang excellent point. You took an aggressive tone and have yet to correct me on what part of my thinking is wrong, I'm clearly being irrational.

                  • twitter [any]
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    3 years ago

                    :honk-enraged: Debaaaaaate meeeeee

                    *also lmao the poster who was just summarily labeling people moral reprobates for the crime of listening to the wrong genre of podcasts is now offended by someone taking an "aggressive tone." Just the biggest karen energy

                      • twitter [any]
                        ·
                        3 years ago

                        :honk-enraged: I said, debaaaaaaaate meeeeeee

      • axont [she/her, comrade/them]
        ·
        3 years ago

        Was it? That's when the Zodiac killer was a national news story every week and everyone and their mom became Hercule Poirot.