This discourse was going around twitter today apparently and im curious takes from here.

Show
Show

Which is it for you?

For me i prefer playersexuality. I want to be able to romance any romance option regardless of my charachters gender. I dont want to be stuck with only Arcade Gannon if i want to do m/m

I agree that sexuality can be important to a charachter. But if you wanna do that, seems like the charachter can just not be a romance option.

That said. In RPGs devs can do what they want. You want a charachter to be monosexual and a romance option, have at it. (Unless theyre all straight, then fuck you).

I do kinda hate what The Sims did by adding monosexuality. Felt like such a virtue signal that made the game less fun. All Sims being pansexual was always more fun for me. Especially since i usually play that game as a pansexual slut. Unless i decide my player Sim is mono, but thats on the player's end.

Monosexual townies in the Sims should at least be optional (is it? Idk havent played Sims 4 since this update).

  • TraumaDumpling
    ·
    il y a 10 mois

    i was thinking of baldurs gate 3 actually but yea

    • autismdragon [he/him, they/them]
      hexagon
      ·
      il y a 10 mois

      I get why some people would not enjoy what BG3 does. It needs a safe for asexuals mode where the charachters dont hit on you lol.

      Romance in games def isnt abour titilation for me, and i could do without the softcore scenes.

      But personally, i havent played the game but i like what it does mostly.