Exactly. Because MRAs are a mostly online movement with no substantive bearing to real life. Your response does not address the key issues of rightist christian moralistic thinking and the resulting views on marriage based on a correlation fallacy and slave morality.
Even assuming I have seen an MRA protest in the flesh (from a distance due to their rancid stench), their numbers would still be nothing in comparison to the total population of men in the area of protest, an unknown portion of which would be partnered/married. Therefore, a generalization cannot be drawn between the aforementioned rotten acolytes of nurgle and the majority of men.
I really shouldn't bother to respond beyond this because I have already addressed that point, while you have yet again failed to address my key point of the right wing christian mind prison. However:
MRAs are largely drawn from the 48+ single/divorced and boo-hoo-hoo about it crowd.
Once again you take a tiny, tiny minority of antifeminist nurglings who are limited to the online and have no bearing on reality, then, you extrapolate their behaviour/character to make a universal judgement (one might say, god's eye) to the majority of men with no other empirical datapoints besides "muh christian morality" and "muh fee fees". Its absolutely nonsensical, the "crowd" of psychopathic human failures you allude to simply does not exist, what exists in its place are rather tired, alienated, beaten down people.
If you even want to respond after this then please address your christian morality before anything instead of dilly dallying around this point which you have lost on.
Removed by mod
Exactly. Because MRAs are a mostly online movement with no substantive bearing to real life. Your response does not address the key issues of rightist christian moralistic thinking and the resulting views on marriage based on a correlation fallacy and slave morality.
Even assuming I have seen an MRA protest in the flesh (from a distance due to their rancid stench), their numbers would still be nothing in comparison to the total population of men in the area of protest, an unknown portion of which would be partnered/married. Therefore, a generalization cannot be drawn between the aforementioned rotten acolytes of nurgle and the majority of men.
Removed by mod
I really shouldn't bother to respond beyond this because I have already addressed that point, while you have yet again failed to address my key point of the right wing christian mind prison. However:
Once again you take a tiny, tiny minority of antifeminist nurglings who are limited to the online and have no bearing on reality, then, you extrapolate their behaviour/character to make a universal judgement (one might say, god's eye) to the majority of men with no other empirical datapoints besides "muh christian morality" and "muh fee fees". Its absolutely nonsensical, the "crowd" of psychopathic human failures you allude to simply does not exist, what exists in its place are rather tired, alienated, beaten down people.
If you even want to respond after this then please address your christian morality before anything instead of dilly dallying around this point which you have lost on.
:cringe:
Actually go do your homework you plebbit simp.
This account is like two weeks old and likely a wrecker. I wouldn't bother.
Edit: I checked the mod log and they were apologizing for America's nuclear war crimes and imperialism. They're an asshole.
Yet another example of the incel's projection of their own character onto men as a whole. :stupidpol:
Are you intending this as a dunk on me or the guy who argued it was cool to nuke Japan?
:le-pol-face: in action
yes it was a dunk on the incel who assumes all men are bad because MRAs (and himself) are bad
Dope. Have had a couple, thanks.