One thing that stuck out early is how much Star Wars took from it. Very immediately, the desert planet setting, the idea of a chosen one, the emperor, etc but really what got me is that Paul has such a more interesting struggle with evil than Luke does. Paul sees a future where he leads a holy war that kills a whole lot of people, where as Luke just vaguely struggles with the Dark Side, the ends arent really explored, its just the process that matters (Luke is a lib).
Anyways, sick book. Loved it, will read the sequel. Hoping to get more of the 4 year old girl with multiple intelligences, very sick.
He was an old rich white anti-government guy. But I'm not seeing much to define him as reactionary, unless simply being in the George Romney wing of the GOP qualifies you.
I think the best thinkers do actually game their theories out a few steps, rather than doing Ayn Rand's Utopianism and then blaming everyone else for failing their vision. But, again, I think you might be confusing a Futurist high on his own farts for someone with genuinely terrible politics.
I dunno dude, if being a massive homophobe to the point where you won't let your estranged gay son go to his mom's deathbed, and writing speeches for the republican party doesn't make you a reactionary, I'm not sure what the fuck does lmao
guy born in 1920 not down with gay people? I am shocked i say, shocked. canceled.