:desolate:

I don't think I have to explain why this doesn't represent the majority of anarchists but if you say it does you're just being insufferable on purpose

  • Melon [she/her,they/them]
    ·
    3 years ago

    I'm checking out the other two things that pseudonym has written, and the self-referential stuff is... telling

    this stuff isn't as high-energy but basically they have untreated depression

    I’ve been a disaster enthusiast since I was young enough to read. That might sound strange and gruesome, but I somehow got my hands on a massive tome of despair called...

    Anybody in the United States who has gone to see a therapist, psychiatrist, or other mental health professional has inevitably heard the positivity spiel. It goes like this: you go in for terrible depression, anxiety, or any number of conditions that are branded abnormal or deviant. Sometimes this is because of personal problems—grief over the death of a loved one for instance—or visual and auditory hallucinations, things that in the past been were the realm of shamans and witches, but are now efficiently exorcised through pharmaceuticals. However, more and more people are seeking help because of a deep existential crisis, which at its root is the state of the world.

    (I should take this moment to interject that people should not interact with or otherwise affirm experienced hallucinations, as it does a severe disservice to a schizophrenic person who is trying to piece together what is really happening, and many have attested that it's a nightmare when the real world is interacting with their hallucinations.)

    Most anarchists believe monsters are a product of society, rather than a uniquely human problem that no utopia, no matter how well prefigured, could ever banish. Anarchists shy away from being called terrorists when we should be accepting that label with open arms.

    .

    In another edition, they defend the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooter.

    I have to spoil this next bit for obvious reasons

    brackets are mine:

    Attacking innocents is incredibly taboo. Even to admit you understand, much less are sympathetic to, the actions of people like Frazier [a random person who killed an entire family in the 60's] or Lanza [the fucking Sandy Hook shooter], will cause you to be shunned. This is especially true when the taboo against the killing of children is transgressed. Everything must be palatable to the masses. Nothing is more sacred to the masses than children, who represent hope for the future of the human race. But that future will no doubt be as horrific in its banality as the world now.

    There's more:

    Lanza saw how we are shaped from birth to accept [the obscenity of materialism] and enjoy being caged. Like warriors before them they refused to see humans as more valuable than other life on earth and had no moral qualms about extinguishing lives no matter how young and innocent. In fact, they may be seen as having acted from a place of kindness, as suggested by Adam Lanza’s very personal killing of his mother before he left for the school. In his mind he wasn’t deranged; he had been pacing his cage his whole life, until he could pace no more. Then he pounced.

    • Brak [they/them, e/em/eir]
      ·
      3 years ago

      Anarchists shy away from being called terrorists when we should be accepting that label with open arms.

      :fedposting: “everything normal people think is bad is good actually.”

      • Helmic [he/him]
        ·
        3 years ago

        yeah if someone is trying to convince you to call yourself a terrorist to fit in you probably should not do that, for the same reason if someone tries to teach you how to make a bomb you probably shouldn't take them up on that offer.