:desolate:
I don't think I have to explain why this doesn't represent the majority of anarchists but if you say it does you're just being insufferable on purpose
:desolate:
I don't think I have to explain why this doesn't represent the majority of anarchists but if you say it does you're just being insufferable on purpose
Come on, dude. This is not something you say about a position you respect in any way, shape, or form. It is ridicule.
You know that, of course. It's not like you don't know what you're doing. You're just arguing in bad faith now.
You're right, I don't respect it because it's a dogshit "philosophy" that only we priviliged westerners have the luxury to contemplate.
Yeah, you're right, the nature of consent and whether we should make massive decisions for other people who are incapable of offering input is just a dumb thing that only we privileged westerners get to think about.
I repeat, read a book. :PIGPOOPBALLS:
deleted by creator
Do you think it's realistic that people would stop having children if they just read the right book?
Come on. This is not how things work, and you know it.
I'm trying to think of a fitting analogy for this sentence, but I'm really drawing a blank. It's just such a non-sequitur, brought about by your own proud and willful ignorance. You have literally no idea what you're talking about, you sound exactly like the average republican chud talking about socialism. Like, you heard the word "antinatalism" and then you invented in your own head what it means, independent of anything else, and then decided it was bad and wrong. And when other people go all :jesse-wtf: because you're operating on a definition absolutely no one else in the world uses, you just get even more condescending and double down on your ignorance.
The "privileged western" perspective is to have extremely strong opinions on things you literally know nothing about.
Read a book. :PIGPOOPBALLS: :PIGPOOPBALLS: :PIGPOOPBALLS: