• cawsby [he/him]
    ·
    3 years ago

    We went from full genome DNA testing costing 100 million dollars in 2001 to $1,000 today.

    • gullyfoyleismyname [none/use name]
      hexagon
      ·
      3 years ago

      Fat load of good it's done, we don't even have brain computer interfaces or implantable drug glands or people with Iridescent skin because of gene editing

      • cawsby [he/him]
        ·
        edit-2
        3 years ago

        We now have the full genome of over a dozen Neanderthals.

        If we wanted to we could bring them back like they plan to do with the wooly mammoths.

            • gullyfoyleismyname [none/use name]
              hexagon
              ·
              3 years ago

              Unless I get to eat one and they taste super good it aint worth it. I can pet elephants already and they are way cooler because they're grey and grey is a fun color for an animal to be

          • Horsepaste [they/them]
            ·
            3 years ago

            Graeber really emphasizes in that article about the importance of “blue sky” research.

            Doing cool shit for the sake of knowledge is exactly what we should be aiming for. Shouldn’t be all of our focus, but someone fascinated in wooly mammoths should be able to run with that.

        • gullyfoyleismyname [none/use name]
          hexagon
          ·
          edit-2
          3 years ago

          same. At this point I read Peter Watts books and go "WOW Cool Future!" because at least that has cyborgs and brain implants that eliminate the need for sleep

    • Fartbutt420 [he/him]
      ·
      3 years ago

      Part of the answer has to do with the concentration of resources on a handful of gigantic projects: “big science,” as it has come to be called. The Human Genome Project is often held out as an example. After spending almost three billion dollars and employing thousands of scientists and staff in five different countries, it has mainly served to establish that there isn’t very much to be learned from sequencing genes that’s of much use to anyone else. Even more, the hype and political investment surrounding such projects demonstrate the degree to which even basic research now seems to be driven by political, administrative, and marketing imperatives that make it unlikely anything revolutionary will happen.