Permanently Deleted

  • Bluegrass_Buddhist [none/use name]
    ·
    edit-2
    3 years ago

    This is why a blanket legal premise of "innocent until proven guilty" is stupid, or at least favors the powerful. If the defendant in a case is a massive corporation or state with all the legal power in the world behind it, proving its guilt while operating under an assumption of innocence is next to impossible.

    If you're a state, a company or an agent thereof, you should have to prove your innocence operating under an assumption of guilt.