Does anybody else get unreasonably annoyed at the vast majority of rpg games that are feudal societys on a surface level but are actually capitalist societys under a thin vineer. I was trying to play pillars of eternity but became incredibly annoyed at the frist quest of the game revolving around a mill which is in a lord's domain but is privately owned and operated and which the townsfolk sell their grain to in exchange for currency (to later buy back with the same currency). I had to put the game down right there.

I think a lot of the time it's an outgrowth from developers feeling the need to have a commonly circulated currency. Although the answer in my opinion isn't to faithfully recreate feudalism but to create a unique social formation for the conditions of the world, I've always loved the eberron campaign setting for that reason.

    • Teekeeus
      ·
      edit-2
      27 days ago

      deleted by creator

        • Catherine_Steward [she/her]
          ·
          edit-2
          3 years ago

          That’s true, but the elves, particularly the Ayleids

          The Ayleids are irrelevant here because they lived in what is now Cyrodiil and were brought down by a slave rebellion. Ironically you are being very racist by bringing up the Ayleids when the conversation was about the Falmer that the nords committed genocide against.

          • zifnab25 [he/him, any]
            ·
            3 years ago

            Ironically you are being very racist by bringing up the Ayleids when the conversation was about the Falmer that the nords committed genocide against.

            :shapiro-gavel:

            • UlyssesT
              ·
              edit-2
              18 days ago

              deleted by creator