:sadness-abysmal:

    • unperson [he/him]
      ·
      2 years ago

      They always could be ignored. I'm astonished at how everyone around me forgot all common sense and uncritically embraced a platitude that's quite absurd on its face: where's the less lethal HIV? Where's the less lethal smallpox and measles, the less lethal polio? The safe number of cases for those viral diseases was deemed to be zero and in a time before all institutions had been neutered by neoliberalism they turned from endemic to eradicated in a coordinated international effort.

        • unperson [he/him]
          ·
          2 years ago

          You see, they were right after all. Only 0.5% paralysed people. Mild, if you ask me :biden-troll:.

          • solaranus
            ·
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            deleted by creator

      • Mardoniush [she/her]
        ·
        2 years ago

        I think there's evidence HIV is becoming less deadly, but only slightly. I've said this before but we're looking at decades timescales for any real drop in severity.

    • TheModerateTankie [any]
      ·
      2 years ago

      Yes. Best case scenario is the virus doesn't mutate too much and less people are hospitalized and die in the next wave. If less people are hospitalized and die in the next wave, even if it's 80% of what we are seeing now and hospitals and services are crippled again, they will declare their strategy a success.

      • keepcarrot [she/her]
        ·
        2 years ago

        In a hundred years time, we'll have a new plague and people will justify not doing anything about it because "Common covid kills more people annually".