I find there tends to be two general categories of books; those that are exciting and interesting, so much that I want to recommend them immediately, and “slogs” that are just slow and unappealing regardless of the content. Some I get the jist of fast and a lot seems irrelevant like What is to Be Done, some like Fresh Banana Leaves the writing is just dislikable and repetitive. This is in sharp contrast to books like Half Earth Socialism or State and Revolution where I may be familiar with some of the content, but I really like the style and new information and want to recommend to people.

Do you agree with this categorization? Are there any books that you feel strongly about either way? I’m sure I’ve heard a lot of your recommendations before, but I want to know what will actually be fun to read, because some aren’t even if the content is good. I want to know which to prioritize reading.

  • buckykat [none/use name]
    ·
    8 months ago

    Iain M. Banks' Culture series, about a fully automated luxury gay space communist society as far beyond Star Trek's Federation as the Federation is beyond us now. Each book is a separate narrative with separate characters, so they can be read in any order. I recommend starting with Player of Games.

    • oktherebuddy
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      I also recommend starting with Player of Games, and then also immediately ending with Player of Games lol

      • buckykat [none/use name]
        ·
        8 months ago

        Wrong. Player of Games isn't even the best one, it's just the best introduction for newcomers. My favorite is Surface Detail.

  • someone [comrade/them, they/them]
    ·
    8 months ago

    It's almost a cliche at this point to recommend Terry Pratchett given that he's one of the most famous recent authors in the english language and is particularly known for his comedy. But one of his books that's been at the forefront of my mind for the past few years - and especially the last few months - is Jingo. On the surface it's a lighthearted and very funny book, easy to breeze through in an afternoon. But the underlying topics it handles are quite serious. Nationalism and militarism, the use of propaganda both overt and subtle, imperialism and colonialism, racism and other bigotries, they're all put under the microscope. I think Pratchett's takes on those topics are good ones.

    Of course there's the usual caveat that Pratchett likes his cops, and portrays them as the heroes of the story. But it is a work of fiction after all.

    • QueerCommie@lemmygrad.ml
      hexagon
      ·
      8 months ago

      When I’m reading a book I tend to feel that it is generally good or bad. Enjoyable to read or not. Maybe your experience is more nuanced, but I want to hear books people had fun reading and think are also important.

  • oktherebuddy
    ·
    8 months ago

    October by China Mieville was unbelievably good. Narrativized history of the 1917 Russian revolutions.

  • JoeByeThen [he/him, they/them]
    ·
    8 months ago

    Comrades recently got me into Becky Chambers. I devoured almost everything she published in like a week. So maybe check her out if scifi is your thing.

        • someone [comrade/them, they/them]
          ·
          8 months ago

          The trick with Discworld is that the author got much better, and much more into actually-pretty-good-takes social commentary, as the series went along. The first few books ("The Colour of Magic" and "The Light Fantastic") are really funny but not really representative of his work as a whole. It's best to think of them as a sort of alternative-universe thing. I'd actually not bother with them until you read a good chunk of the rest of the series.

          Every Discworld fan has their own recommended reading order, but I think a good starting point are these books:

          "Wyrd Sisters". This introduces the series' witches, who are awesome and not exactly what you might think when you hear "witch". Their thing is that they try to avoid doing magic by instead doing psychology (what they call "headology"), because the latter is more effective in the long run. If someone is magic'd into doing something, they might stop doing it when the magic stops. But someone who thinks that something was their own idea might keep doing it. Imagine a mix of Hamlet and Macbeth, directed by Charlie Chaplin, and written by Rob Grant and Doug Naylor.

          "Guards! Guards!". This introduces the City Watch, the police of the biggest city on the disc. Of course all cops are bastards. Which all the cops on the Watch would agree with. The Watch are down to three members, led by an alcoholic named Sam Vimes - and then they get a super-keen recruit from abroad who's the most stereotypically super-earnest-and-super-buff farmboy you can imagine and who has no idea what trouble he's gotten himself into. They drunkenly stumble into a plot by influential people who want to fill the long-vacant position of King through deeply-stupid-in-retrospect means. It's a D&D campaign written like a hard-boiled detective story.

          "Soul Music". This is one of the Death novels. Death is a major character in the series. But he's actually a very personable type. He doesn't really kill anyone, he's just around when it happens, to help the soul involved move on. This is not the first Death novel, but it's the one I feel is the best introduction to him. More importantly it introduces his granddaughter-by-adoption, Susan. She doesn't technically have Death's real DNA, but she's got a kind of DNA-of-the-soul, so she has his abilities and has to fill in for Death while he's... going through some things. A musician is supposed to die in a barroom brawl, but he doesn't because his soul is being sustained by the music. Susan's job is to make sure he moves on to what comes next. Susan doesn't really want to because she, and the rest of the city, are utterly enthralled by the spirit of rock-and-roll that he's brought to the world. Shenanigans ensue. It's Blues Brothers a la Tolkien, and it is a ride.

        • JoeByeThen [he/him, they/them]
          ·
          8 months ago

          Ah, nonfiction, hmm. If you can get your hands on Margaret Randall's Women in Cuba: 20 years later, it's a pretty inspiring read to see what they accomplished despite all the bullshit from the US. Goes a bit into the background of like the literacy program, how women were integrated into the workforce, and gives a pretty good overview of the FMC's (Federation of Cuban Women) role in building revolutionary Cuba. Fascinating stuff. stalin-approval