9 November 2021
[...]
The Committee approved a draft on the right to food by a recorded vote of 180 in favour to 2 against (Israel, United States), with 0 abstentions, expressing alarm that in 2020, the number of people lacking access to adequate food rose by 320 million - to 2.4 billion - amounting to nearly a third of the world's population, and that between 720 million and 811 million people faced hunger.
"Hunger is a violation of human dignity", Cuba's delegate asserted. Presenting the draft, he voiced concern that the United States has blocked consensus on the text for four years. The United States representative — highlighting conditions in the Lake Chad Basin, Yemen and Somalia ‑ said the draft contains unbalanced and inaccurate positions that her delegation simply cannot support. The concept of food sovereignty could justify food protectionism, negatively impacting food security, she explained, adding that the United States does not recognize the right to food, as it lacks a definition in international law.
do these votes even result in anything though?
They result in people dunking on the US and with each one that gets publicized the image of the US and its factual effect gets chipped away more and more.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Right_to_food
What does this amount to in practice? No idea. But I have to assume some degree of policy is following from these agreements, if for no other reason than local leadership has an interest in keeping food supplies available to their supporting constituencies.