https://mobile.twitter.com/yegg/status/1501716484761997318
I guess three years was a good run: https://mobile.twitter.com/DuckDuckGo/status/1043859278774370305
https://mobile.twitter.com/yegg/status/1501716484761997318
I guess three years was a good run: https://mobile.twitter.com/DuckDuckGo/status/1043859278774370305
Agree, the point was more about only "legit" sources being acceptable. Which do have their own biases. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-security-wikipedia-idUSN1642896020070816
deleted by creator
I wasn't aware of that. I knew they could cite mainstream sources heavily and exclusively, but I didn't know that was the policy rather than just what most editors did.
deleted by creator
Thank you!