Written from the perspective of a researcher; what they failed to consider, their biases, and the colonization of time into imperial time.
Written from the perspective of a researcher; what they failed to consider, their biases, and the colonization of time into imperial time.
Shit, that would make it tough to figure out. What's the general line though?
Could you be more specific about your question; are you asking Matt's overall critique of the book, or what the books thesis itself is?
Oh, I read the book, kinda. I wanted to know Matt's opinion about it.