Kinda trying to piece some ideas together here. If there's theory on this, please send it.

For example, the George Floyd protests were very violent by U.S. standards but we never got to the point of, say, a massacre on the White House lawn. Instead, it was mostly tear gas, police brutality, and the media apparatus quickly countering with propaganda.

If a movement can't be taken down with propaganda (i.e.; :vote: and it will all go away), then the state will need to use more brutal force to maintain itself, correct?

  • Mardoniush [she/her]
    ·
    3 years ago

    It's not just the strengthbof the government, a weak government can supress revolutionary movements easily if material conditions aren't heightened.

    But in times of massive crisis and good revolutionary organisation, yes, your statement holds.