On the one hand, it's a pretty ridiculous claim, and some of the particulars do seem to have an adequate explanation (the "no passport needed" being part of the company's marketing, high prices due to errors/glitches)

On the other, I mean, it's pretty weird and lol

Browsing the top of all time in the sub is an exercise in :agony-minion: because both sides are using the weakest arguments imaginable. "Human name = only possible answer is trafficking no I've never heard of Ikea" vs. "this claim has been DEBUNKED beyond all reasonable doubt by Wayfair saying they don't traffic children"