• eduardog3000 [he/him]
    ·
    edit-2
    3 years ago

    For example, if we had a piece of cake, the Utility Monster would get 1000 times more joy out of eating it than any human, so the action that would cause the most total pleasure would always be to give the cake to the monster.

    "Oh yeah? Well what if I took your idea to an impossible extreme? Not so smart then, huh?"

    • riley
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      deleted by creator

      • Catherine_Steward [she/her]
        ·
        3 years ago

        have you considered that if you watch it with the frames shuffled in completely random order then it would be incomprehensible

        That isn't how he already makes them?

      • eduardog3000 [he/him]
        ·
        edit-2
        3 years ago

        Most of them are either completely useless or actively harmful.

        Like the one about the AI that will punish anyone who didn't actively work towards making it. At best it's useless because it will never exist, at worst it's actively harmful because the existence of the thought experiment itself will cause people to make it real.

        • hexaflexagonbear [he/him]
          ·
          3 years ago

          But this one isn't, this is a valid critique at a very obvious and very real issue with an ethical framework that is at the core of the socio-political structure we currently live under.

        • UlyssesT [he/him]
          ·
          3 years ago

          The Torment Nexus is right around the corner, as inspired by the book Please Don't Build the Torment Nexus! :so-true: