It's not a 1 to 1, but the two core elements of the story are the industrial extermination of an entire ethnicity, and the use of science to build super weapons. The techlevel is late interwar or WWII, best shown by the tank, which is clearly inspired by WWII tanks, not WWI era tanks. The main cast are all officers in the fascist military dictatorship that carried out a war using super weapons against civilians. It's not really subtle.
Yes, you'll recall Germany began using gas attacks before world War 1, as well as genociding people who lived in deserts(Damaraland, as well as other exploits in Africa or the near east). I disagree with your assessment of the tech as ww2, outside the tanks(which I have never seen an anime not explicitly about tanks get right. Makes sense, as ww1 tanks look kinda stupid.) everything seems way more world War 1. Amestris is a country with Xing(China) to the East and Russia to the north, as well as colonized deserts to the south on the way to Xing. They're a new nation, only dating back to the 1860s, and a rising industrial powerhouse making (al)chemical advances and constantly at war. Lots of their citizens have blonde hair and blue eyes, but black hair and brown eyes is dominant. Much of their land is still idyllic countryside, even though industrialization is occurring at a rapid pace. Milk is a staple of their diet, as well as beef and sausage. This is pre-war Germany to a T. If that wasn't enough, Edward literally goes to pre-war Germany (and his dad joins the nazis) in the original. Text is always open to interpretation, but their is just overwhelmingly more textual evidence for pre-war Germany as the allegory than interwar Japan.
so what's your point then? I find it way easier to believe the author was just reacting to modernism and imperialism in general and used a country in a time they thought best exemplified it.
That you think this is downplaying or reimagining Japan's atrocities from around ww2. I am making the point that it just lacks the textual evidence that this is about Japan.
...did it never occur to you that Amestris was Germany circa 1910's? You're really pushing a WW2 allegory I just don't think is there.
It's not a 1 to 1, but the two core elements of the story are the industrial extermination of an entire ethnicity, and the use of science to build super weapons. The techlevel is late interwar or WWII, best shown by the tank, which is clearly inspired by WWII tanks, not WWI era tanks. The main cast are all officers in the fascist military dictatorship that carried out a war using super weapons against civilians. It's not really subtle.
https://fma.fandom.com/wiki/Briggs_Tank
Yes, you'll recall Germany began using gas attacks before world War 1, as well as genociding people who lived in deserts(Damaraland, as well as other exploits in Africa or the near east). I disagree with your assessment of the tech as ww2, outside the tanks(which I have never seen an anime not explicitly about tanks get right. Makes sense, as ww1 tanks look kinda stupid.) everything seems way more world War 1. Amestris is a country with Xing(China) to the East and Russia to the north, as well as colonized deserts to the south on the way to Xing. They're a new nation, only dating back to the 1860s, and a rising industrial powerhouse making (al)chemical advances and constantly at war. Lots of their citizens have blonde hair and blue eyes, but black hair and brown eyes is dominant. Much of their land is still idyllic countryside, even though industrialization is occurring at a rapid pace. Milk is a staple of their diet, as well as beef and sausage. This is pre-war Germany to a T. If that wasn't enough, Edward literally goes to pre-war Germany (and his dad joins the nazis) in the original. Text is always open to interpretation, but their is just overwhelmingly more textual evidence for pre-war Germany as the allegory than interwar Japan.
Yeah that's why it's an allegory and not a costume drama.
The bad guy is called the Führer how much clearer do you want it to be?
so what's your point then? I find it way easier to believe the author was just reacting to modernism and imperialism in general and used a country in a time they thought best exemplified it.
Pretty sure I stated my point very clearly about five comments up.
That you think this is downplaying or reimagining Japan's atrocities from around ww2. I am making the point that it just lacks the textual evidence that this is about Japan.
I disagree with your argument.
Ok. Where do you see the flaw?