because the people who are talking about it are either insane, completely puritanical, totally credulous
why won't people take the tentpole issue of the worst people on the internet seriously?
seriously though the way to get away from their type of rhetoric is to step away from totalising 'porn-bad' (which often dovetails with swerf shit) and just go to personal diagnostic: "you can't get aroused by your partner? it may be because of excessive porn use".
I mean, under capitalism, porn-bad. Ofc it's not inherent but the industry is rife with exploitation in both production and consumption. Even with independent solo stuff or drawn art it's impossible to tell who's producing content because they actually enjoy it vs who's producing because they need the money.
why won't people take the tentpole issue of the worst people on the internet seriously?
seriously though the way to get away from their type of rhetoric is to step away from totalising 'porn-bad' (which often dovetails with swerf shit) and just go to personal diagnostic: "you can't get aroused by your partner? it may be because of excessive porn use".
I mean, under capitalism, porn-bad. Ofc it's not inherent but the industry is rife with exploitation in both production and consumption. Even with independent solo stuff or drawn art it's impossible to tell who's producing content because they actually enjoy it vs who's producing because they need the money.
no ethical consumption yknow how it is